Connect with us

Judiciary

Murder: Complainant Opposes Attorney General’s Approved Plea Bargain

Published

on

By Adenike Lawal

In a significant turn of events in a murder case, Oluwatosin Onamade, the complainant, has strongly opposed a plea bargain agreement approved by the Lagos State Ministry of Justice.

The agreement involves five defendants accused of murdering Onamade’s assistant in Ikorodu, Lagos State.

The case, which has attracted widespread attention due to its violent nature, raises concerns about the fairness of legal processes in the region.

During a court session on Monday, Onamade voiced his dissatisfaction with the plea bargain negotiations, which he claims took place without his involvement.

Speaking before Justice Hakeem Oshodi at the Lagos High Court in Ikeja, Onamade expressed his frustration at not being consulted during discussions between the Attorney-General of Lagos State, Lawal Pedro (SAN), and the defendants.

His objections underscore concerns about transparency and the perceived lack of fairness in the handling of the case.

The five defendants—Atunrase Sodiq Omolabi, Shittu Michael Olawale, Olaide Opeifa, Olanrewaju Adebiyi (also known as Maja), and Jamiu Omosanya (known as Orobo)—are facing serious charges, including murder and attempted murder, in relation to the death of Ifeanyi Etunmuse at Western Funeral Home, owned by Onamade.

It is also alleged that the defendants caused severe injuries to Femi Onamade, Oluwatosin’s brother.

When the defendants were first arraigned, they all pleaded not guilty to a comprehensive seven-count indictment, which includes charges of murder, attempted murder, grievous bodily harm, willful damage to property, unlawful society (cultism), breach of peace, and conspiracy to commit a felony.

At the recent hearing, prosecutor Michael Adewoye informed Justice Oshodi that he had received an application for a plea bargain from the defense counsel representing four of the defendants.

This application, Adewoye said, had already been approved by the Attorney-General.

He also noted that a formal letter confirming the approval had been sent to the defense counsel, but the specific terms of the agreement would be discussed at a later date.

Defense attorney Olanrewaju Ajanaku confirmed receipt of the plea bargain application, adding that terms of the agreement would be negotiated with the prosecution.

Meanwhile, Mahmood Adesina (SAN), representing one defendant, requested that the trial continue without delay.

Justice Oshodi acknowledged Onamade’s commitment to seeking justice but pointed out that his authority as a judge did not extend to overturning an approved plea bargain.

He explained that such decisions are beyond his jurisdiction. As a result, the judge adjourned the proceedings until January 25, 2025, allowing both parties time to consult on the plea bargain terms while ensuring that trial preparations continue.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Judiciary

Chamber Commissioning: Every Empire Will Expire, Akintola Tells Nigerian Leaders

Published

on

By

By Samson Adeyanju

A Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Chief Adeniyi Akintola, has cautioned Nigerian leaders and public office holders against abusing power, stressing that no position of authority or political influence is permanent.

Akintola gave the warning at the commissioning of Dayo Ajibola & Associates, also known as SBA Chambers, where he urged those in positions of authority to remain humble, remember their roots and prepare for life after office.

“Every empire will expire. Let those who are holding public office get this into their heads. Every empire will expire. Every person in a position of authority will come to a time when he will no longer be relevant,” he said.

The legal practitioner also warned politicians against sacrificing people for political interests, urging professionals who interact with political leaders to be cautious and maintain clear boundaries between their principles and political relationships.

He said money should not be allowed to determine a person’s values or professional decisions, urging young lawyers to resist the temptation of seeking immediate financial rewards.

According to him, younger lawyers should focus on building credibility, relationships and professional competence rather than demanding large fees from every client.

“The younger generation lawyers are making the mistake of wanting that money now, now, now. It doesn’t work that way,” Akintola said.

He advised lawyers to carefully assess the clients they represent and avoid fraudulent individuals and activities.

“We have a standard in our office. No room for 419,” he said, stressing that professional reputation remained more valuable than short term financial gains.

Akintola further urged young professionals not to live beyond their means, saying proper financial planning was necessary for sustainable careers and businesses.

He explained that his law office makes provisions for the maintenance and replacement of office equipment, noting that professionals must plan for unforeseen expenses instead of spending all their earnings.

“If you take good care of your job, your job will take good care of you,” he said.

The Senior Advocate also emphasised discipline and commitment to legal practice, particularly punctuality and diligence in handling clients’ briefs.

“The court will not wait for you. You should be in court latest by 8:30. The client that gives you a brief is not waiting for stories. He wants results,” he said.

Akintola urged senior lawyers to continue mentoring younger practitioners and advised employees to remain loyal and committed to their employers.

He also encouraged the new generation to remain prayerful, disciplined and patient, saying genuine professional success is built over time.

Speaking at the occasion, Senator Abdulfatai Buhari, representing Oyo North Senatorial District, commended Akintola for his commitment to mentoring younger professionals.

Buhari, who said he had adjusted his international travel plans to attend the event, congratulated Dayo Ajibola on the commissioning of the chambers.

He said the presence of senior practitioners and other distinguished personalities at the event demonstrated the respect Akintola had earned through his character and professional relationships.

Buhari urged Akintola to remain focused despite betrayal, blackmail and disappointment, saying the growth of people he had mentored should give him satisfaction.

“People will still continue to betray. People will continue to blackmail. People will continue to misbehave, but just be happy that the people you are training are coming up, and you are seeing them growing,” he said.

In his vote of thanks, Barrister Dayo Ajibola, principal of the newly commissioned chambers, expressed appreciation to Akintola, senior lawyers, public officials, friends and other guests for honouring the occasion.

Ajibola, who became emotional while recounting some of the challenges he had overcome, attributed his survival and progress in life to God’s protection, prayers and the support of family, mentors and friends.

He disclosed that he had obtained bachelor’s and master’s degrees before returning to study law, describing his journey into the legal profession as one marked by several challenges and near tragedies.

Ajibola thanked Akintola for his mentorship and described his presence at the commissioning as a significant honour.

He also expressed appreciation to the senior members of the legal profession who attended the ceremony, saying their support had encouraged him to continue building the new law firm.

The commissioning marked a significant milestone for Dayo Ajibola & Associates and brought together members of the legal profession, political figures, friends and associates.

Continue Reading

Judiciary

BREAKING: Judge Withdraws from El-Rufai’s Fundamental Rights Suit

Published

on

By

By Olokuta Rofiat

A judge of the FCT High Court has withdrawn from the fundamental rights enforcement suit filed by former Kaduna State Governor, Nasir El-Rufai.

Justice Hussaini Belgore recused himself from the matter on Friday for undisclosed reasons, paving the way for the case to be reassigned and delaying further proceedings.

El-Rufai had sued the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission, the Inspector-General of Police and others, alleging a violation of his constitutional rights following the search of his Abuja residence. He is seeking damages and declarations that his rights were breached.

Separately, the Department of State Services has filed criminal charges against him at the Federal High Court in Abuja over alleged unlawful interception of communications. The case was adjourned to April 23, 2026.

Legal observers say reassignment of the fundamental rights suit may take weeks before hearings resume.

Continue Reading

Judiciary

El-Rufai Drags ICPC to Court, Demands N1bn Compensation

Published

on

By

By Patrick Idowu

Former Kaduna State Governor Nasir El-Rufai has filed a N1 billion lawsuit against the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC), following an allegedly unlawful raid on his Abuja residence.

Through his lead counsel, Oluwole Iyamu, SAN, El-Rufai is asking the court to invalidate a February 4 search warrant issued by an FCT Magistrate’s Court, citing material drafting errors, ambiguity, and a lack of probable cause.

He contends that the execution of the warrant violated his constitutional rights under Section 37, rendering any evidence obtained during the search inadmissible in future proceedings.

The former governor is seeking an injunction to bar the ICPC from utilizing any seized items and is demanding heavy financial restitution for the encounter.

His N1 billion claim includes N300 million for psychological trauma, N400 million in exemplary damages to deter law enforcement misconduct, and N300 million in aggravated damages for the “malicious and high-handed” nature of the operation.

Additionally, El-Rufai is requesting N100 million to cover his legal fees and the overall cost of the litigation.

Continue Reading

Trending