By Adenike Lawal
In a significant turn of events in a murder case, Oluwatosin Onamade, the complainant, has strongly opposed a plea bargain agreement approved by the Lagos State Ministry of Justice.
The agreement involves five defendants accused of murdering Onamade’s assistant in Ikorodu, Lagos State.
The case, which has attracted widespread attention due to its violent nature, raises concerns about the fairness of legal processes in the region.
During a court session on Monday, Onamade voiced his dissatisfaction with the plea bargain negotiations, which he claims took place without his involvement.
Speaking before Justice Hakeem Oshodi at the Lagos High Court in Ikeja, Onamade expressed his frustration at not being consulted during discussions between the Attorney-General of Lagos State, Lawal Pedro (SAN), and the defendants.
His objections underscore concerns about transparency and the perceived lack of fairness in the handling of the case.
The five defendants—Atunrase Sodiq Omolabi, Shittu Michael Olawale, Olaide Opeifa, Olanrewaju Adebiyi (also known as Maja), and Jamiu Omosanya (known as Orobo)—are facing serious charges, including murder and attempted murder, in relation to the death of Ifeanyi Etunmuse at Western Funeral Home, owned by Onamade.
It is also alleged that the defendants caused severe injuries to Femi Onamade, Oluwatosin’s brother.
When the defendants were first arraigned, they all pleaded not guilty to a comprehensive seven-count indictment, which includes charges of murder, attempted murder, grievous bodily harm, willful damage to property, unlawful society (cultism), breach of peace, and conspiracy to commit a felony.
At the recent hearing, prosecutor Michael Adewoye informed Justice Oshodi that he had received an application for a plea bargain from the defense counsel representing four of the defendants.
This application, Adewoye said, had already been approved by the Attorney-General.
He also noted that a formal letter confirming the approval had been sent to the defense counsel, but the specific terms of the agreement would be discussed at a later date.
Defense attorney Olanrewaju Ajanaku confirmed receipt of the plea bargain application, adding that terms of the agreement would be negotiated with the prosecution.
Meanwhile, Mahmood Adesina (SAN), representing one defendant, requested that the trial continue without delay.
Justice Oshodi acknowledged Onamade’s commitment to seeking justice but pointed out that his authority as a judge did not extend to overturning an approved plea bargain.
He explained that such decisions are beyond his jurisdiction. As a result, the judge adjourned the proceedings until January 25, 2025, allowing both parties time to consult on the plea bargain terms while ensuring that trial preparations continue.
