Connect with us

Judiciary

Akinmade Slams Adebutu for Orchestrating Violence in Ogun

Published

on

The Ogun State Government has condemned the actions and allegations of Hon. Ladi Adebutu, describing them as a desperate attempt to distract from his own role in orchestrating electoral violence during the recent local government elections.

Speaking through the Special Adviser to the Governor on Media and Strategy, Hon. Kayode Akinmade, the government, refuted Adebutu’s claims that Governor Dapo Abiodun used armed personnel to intimidate voters, labelling them as baseless fabrications.

Akinmade asserted that Adebutu’s statements were an attempt to shift blame and disguise his own culpability in a series of violent incidents.

Governor Abiodun, widely respected for his peaceful demeanour and commitment to law and order, conducted himself with the utmost integrity on election day, voting peacefully and returning home immediately afterwards.

The governor later travelled to Ondo State, leaving no room for the allegations of intimidation or violence levelled against him.

In stark contrast, Adebutu has been accused of importing 40 policemen from MOPOL 49 in Lagos, an act that blatantly violated electoral laws.

These officers, allegedly acting under Adebutu’s orders, collaborated with armed thugs to disrupt polling stations, snatch ballot boxes, and terrorize voters.

Among the victims of these violent tactics was Hon. Muhammed Olaitan Efuwape, Vice Chairman of Ikenne Local Government, who was shot alongside another voter at a polling unit.

Enraged voters reportedly chased the rogue officers, who sought refuge in Adebutu’s compound. Rather than cooperating with law enforcement, Adebutu allegedly aided their escape, obstructing justice and further implicating himself in the day’s chaos.

Akinmade did not mince words in his criticism of Adebutu, describing him as a “drowning man” whose political career is on a downward spiral.

“This individual is trying to assume the role of the Chief Security Officer of Ogun State, and that is impossible,” Akinmade said, urging Adebutu to turn himself in to law enforcement authorities.

He further lambasted Adebutu for spreading “wicked lies” and fostering division, accusing him of a history of falsehoods, including his failed legal challenges to Governor Abiodun’s election victory.

“As a professional clown whose own running mate said he would have been a disaster as governor, Adebutu has consistently spun tales to mask his political failings,” Akinmade stated.

The government’s stance highlights the stark contrast between Governor Abiodun’s leadership, characterized by peace and progress, and Adebutu’s tactics, which Akinmade described as dangerous and divisive.

Under Abiodun’s administration, Ogun State has enjoyed unprecedented political stability, making the violent disruptions allegedly orchestrated by Adebutu even more alarming.

Akinmade emphasized the need for accountability, stating, “It is in Adebutu’s best interest to cooperate with law enforcement officers by turning himself in, rather than trying to exonerate himself from the mayhem unleashed on the peace-loving residents of Iperu.”

The Ogun State Government reiterated its commitment to upholding democracy and ensuring that those who attempt to undermine it face the full weight of the law.

Akinmade’s statements serve as a clear warning against any attempt to destabilize the state’s democratic processes for personal or political gain.

As Ogun State residents continue to witness development and unity under Governor Abiodun’s leadership, the government called on the public to reject divisive rhetoric and remain steadfast in their support for leaders who prioritize the collective good over selfish ambitions.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Judiciary

Edo: PDP, APC Gear Up for Legal Battle

Published

on

By Jesusemen Oratokhai

The Edo Governorship Election Petition Tribunal has commenced in Benin City, setting the stage for a legal battle between the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), and the All Progressives Congress (APC), over the September 21 gubernatorial election.

PDP candidate Asue Ighodalo is challenging the results declared by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), alleging electoral malpractice, including inflated APC votes and unlawful cancellations of PDP votes in key areas.

PDP spokesperson Barrister Tony Ehilebo expressed confidence in their case, stating, “We have solid evidence to prove the election was rigged, and we trust the tribunal to uphold justice.”

However, the APC has dismissed the claims as unfounded.

Party chieftain Chief Alex Okosun urged unity, arguing that Ighodalo should support Governor Okpebholo instead of pursuing litigation.

The tribunal’s proceedings are being closely watched, as the verdict could shape Edo’s political future and test the judiciary’s commitment to electoral justice.

Continue Reading

Judiciary

Court Halts Federal High Court’s Involvement in Kano Emirate Dispute

Published

on

By Patrick Idowu

In a dramatic twist, the Court of Appeal in Abuja has ruled to bar the Federal High Court in Kano from hearing the ongoing legal battle over the Kano Emirate.

In a split decision, two Justices backed the move, asserting that the matter falls under the jurisdiction of the Kano State High Court.

Justice Gabriel Kolawole, delivering the lead judgment, declared that the Federal High Court had no authority over chieftaincy disputes, ordering the case to be transferred to the Kano State High Court.

However, the Presiding Justice, Mustapha Mohammed, and another Justice disagreed on the transfer, opting instead to strike out the case entirely.

The ruling puts a definitive end to the Federal High Court’s involvement, reaffirming the exclusive jurisdiction of the Kano State High Court in chieftaincy matters.

Continue Reading

Judiciary

Court Halts Federal Allocations to LGAs Without Elected Officials

Published

on

By Alexis Uchendu

In a landmark ruling, the Federal High Court has ordered the Federal Government to withhold allocations from Local Government Areas (LGAs), governed by unelected officials.

The decision reinforces the constitutional mandate requiring states to ensure democratically elected councils at the local level.

The ruling directly challenges the widespread practice of state governors appointing caretaker committees or administrators instead of conducting elections.

It underscores the principles of accountability, transparency, and constitutional governance in local administration.

This judgment is expected to force non-compliant states to hold LGA elections or risk losing federal funding, marking a significant shift in the fight against executive overreach at the state level.

Continue Reading

Trending