Senator Magnus Abe, the former governorship candidate of the Social Democratic Party (SDP) and a former commissioner in Rivers State, recently shared insights on the ongoing conflict between former Governor Nyesom Wike and his successor, Governor Siminalayi Fubara. He also discussed the impeachment move by the State House of Assembly and other related issues.
Excerpt:
“I want to emphasize that I’m not aligning with any particular faction. My intention today is not to take sides but rather to remind the people of Rivers State about the enduring cost of the political crises we’ve experienced. Although I am currently estranged from the Minister, who is my friend, and I do not know the governor personally, my primary concern as a part of Rivers State is to focus on the state’s interests amidst these political tensions.
The current situation in the state mirrors past conflicts between the Minister and the governor, and before that, between the governor and the then Minister, who is now back as the Minister of FCT. It’s essential to recognize that there can only be one governor at a time. Regardless of how the governor emerges, our collective goal should be to ensure that the state can progress in peace. During my time as Commissioner in Rivers State, we competed with Lagos State, and I closely monitored their activities. We were almost on par, and that experience instilled in me a deep respect for President Bola Tinubu, the only politician engaging in politics with figures.
In Nigerian politics, we often prioritize loyalty over everything else, neglecting honesty, integrity, competence, and capacity. This focus on loyalty can lead to isolation from the realities faced by the common people. When individuals raise concerns about these issues, they risk being labeled as disloyal. My advice to all parties involved is to exercise caution. I appreciate the conciliatory stance taken by the governor, describing it as a ‘father and son quarrel.’ It’s now up to the father to accept the offer of peace and make comments that facilitate a common ground for resolution. This way, peace can be restored in Rivers State, allowing its people to move forward.
I voluntarily withdrew my case in court to contribute to the peace process and enable the governor, who has emerged, to lead with peace. I recall a similar situation during my time in the Senate when some members of the State House of Assembly attempted to take over the Assembly to impeach Governor Rotimi Amaechi. I led a demonstration to protect the Assembly, emphasizing the need to prevent undue interference. The events in Rivers State are not unprecedented, but it is the people of Rivers State who ultimately bear the brunt. Therefore, I refrain from commenting on the Minister’s statement, as my public remarks, regardless of my intentions, may escalate the situation if not carefully articulated. Nigerians have heard the Minister’s words, and it is up to them to interpret them. My advice to all parties involved is to recognize that in politics, there are no small or big individuals.
When asked about the justification for the Minister’s statement that he is fighting to protect his political base and the actions in the state, I responded by emphasizing the essential elements of politics. We should focus on numbers, specifically the relevant numbers that impact the people of Rivers State. These include family income, how these numbers are generated, and how they can be improved. A structure that benefits the majority does not require forceful protection because those who benefit will naturally support it.
I am cautious not to inflame the situation with my comments, and I prefer not to comment on the Minister’s statement. Instead, my emphasis is on how much the people of Rivers State can gain from the current political landscape. We should focus on improving income, generating opportunities, ensuring access to quality education and healthcare, and enhancing overall quality of life. The present crisis does not contribute positively to these aspects.
Regarding the dynamics between outgoing and incoming governors, I explained that tension often arises, but it needs to be managed appropriately. When governors hand over to their successors, especially when they are handpicked, the transition can be challenging. It requires a delicate balance where the outgoing governor steps back, allowing the successor to govern without constant interference. This issue is not unique to Rivers State, and while it may persist, it needs to be managed effectively.
Addressing the perceived power of Governor Wike in Rivers State, I clarified that every governor of Rivers State has historically wielded considerable power. During Governor Peter Odili’s tenure, he was considered one of the most influential governors in Nigeria. Similarly, Governor Rotimi Amaechi, as the chairman of the Governors Forum, held significant influence. The strength of the governor’s position inherently grants power, irrespective of the individual holding the office.”