Dada Olusegun, Special Assistant to the President on New Media, has issued a stern warning to anybody trying to disrupt the country under whatever pretext in a sharply worded response to recent statewide protests. In a tweet that has now received substantial attention, Olusegun declared:
“Those who want to burn the country down under whatever guise will meet the strongest resistance of their lives. Not from security agencies, but from the silent majority that gave their mandate to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu for four years in the first instance. We are waiting.”
This message follows growing tension and calls for mass demonstrations against the current administration. Olusegun’s tweet suggests that the presidency is prepared for any form of unrest, indicating a level of preparedness that extends beyond official security forces to include what he described as “the silent majority.”
The tweet has been interpreted as both a warning and a call to action, signaling that the government is mobilizing its supporters to counter any attempts to destabilize the nation. The phrase “We are waiting” has particularly raised concerns, with critics arguing that it could incite violence or intimidation against protestors.
Supporters of the administration view Olusegun’s statement as a necessary measure to maintain order and protect the democratic mandate of President Tinubu, who has faced increasing scrutiny and criticism since taking office. They argue that such resistance is essential to prevent the country from descending into chaos and to uphold the authority granted to the President by the electorate.
On the other hand, opponents argue that the language used in the tweet could be seen as a threat and could escalate the situation further. They call for a more measured approach and emphasize the need for dialogue rather than confrontation.
As the situation develops, all eyes will be on how both the government and protest organisers navigate this charged atmosphere. The presidency’s clear stance indicates a commitment to resisting what it perceives as threats to national stability, while critics call for peaceful and constructive avenues for addressing grievances.
In the meantime, the public remains divided, with many closely watching the unfolding events and their potential implications for Nigeria’s political and social landscape.
